|
此文章由 xhchris 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 xhchris 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
gohappy 发表于 2017-2-14 11:19 
“法官并未认可公诉人提供的作案动机,但认可了谢作案的事实。”
你的意思是法官并未认可性侵是动机之一 ...
我说的话为什么要收回?
你故意混淆视听不是秀下限?你文化水平跟不上能看懂判词原文?
你们这帮人不是最喜欢咬文爵字钻牛角尖吗?
关于crown指控的两项动机,法官是这么说的
While either or both of those motives may have been what motivated the offender to execute the meticulously planned murder of at least Min and Lily Lin (irrespective of whether that plan also contemplated the potential that other occupants of the house might need to be killed if they were roused from sleep by the force of his attack on Min and Lily Lin, to avoid them identifying him as the killer or raising the alarm and inhibiting him from leaving the house unseen), I am unable to make that finding beyond reasonable doubt. However, given that I am satisfied that the offender entered the Lin family home knowing the occupants would be asleep, that he disabled the power in order to exercise control over them and that he was armed with a weapon fashioned for the purpose of applying maximum assaultive force, the fact that I am unable to reach a point of satisfaction to the criminal standard as to what in fact motivated him to do what he did does nothing to diminish the gravity of his offending.
判词全文
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bi ... /NSWSC/2017/63.html
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|