新足迹

 找回密码
 注册

精华好帖回顾

· 坝上风光 (2013-8-6) wangbo1118 · 圣诞四日游-Lakes Entrance, Eden, Merimbula (2005-1-7) 蜻蜓
· 刀削面,刀削面,太给力的削面刀~~ (2011-6-8) bluesummer · 老陶烧菜啦 - 上海人的一天 :序,早餐,午餐,(美女品食真人兽),晚餐 (2008-9-20) 老陶
Advertisement
Advertisement
楼主:SS987

CPA 117 2011 S2 Case 2 Pacific Brands 討論 [复制链接]

发表于 2011-10-14 01:13 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 sofiwy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 sofiwy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
原帖由 Chchou 于 2011-10-13 01:06 发表

Value destroy: sell- off brands and write-down assets

For 7s, I can't find fact to do the analysis, apart from for culture(part of shared value): selecting people for key position.

If anyone thinks ...


7S, methinks  more appropriate used for acquistion , alliance such scenarios, such as Blue sky, so it seems very little info to be addressed here, or are there any problems PBs facing per each S?

re 8step, how should have been done , such questions are really text based ??? or personal views ??
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-14 13:44 |显示全部楼层

回复 yonei999 30# 帖子

此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
thanks

发表于 2011-10-14 16:26 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 kreuz777 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 kreuz777 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
I can’t find more about 7s model. (eg: systems? Style?)  I think 5Q is more possible and also SWOT analysis.

发表于 2011-10-14 17:14 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
for answering 5q's growth, is there a straight forward stated stategy in the case fact saying  that PB want to grow.

发表于 2011-10-14 17:22 |显示全部楼层

回复 siyuezhao 34# 帖子

此文章由 schee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 schee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Yes - see page 1 in bold - Sue CEO since Jan 2008 led the change.....in order to generate growth

发表于 2011-10-14 18:25 |显示全部楼层

回复 schee 35# 帖子

此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
thanks
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-14 20:06 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
what should we put under customer perspective for the BSC.
it only mentioned one of its customer"Kmart"

发表于 2011-10-14 21:23 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
do you think we need use SWOT to analysis this case?

发表于 2011-10-14 22:52 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
I know everyone is getting bored. A few mood buttons for the weekend :)

"Damn right! I am good in Bed. I can sleep for days"

"And your bullshXX opinion would be"

"I am sorry. My fault. I forgot you were an idiot"

"A hard-on doesn't count as personal growth"

发表于 2011-10-15 01:29 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 maidywang 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 maidywang 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
For scale of change, would it be Modular transformation or Corporate transformation be more suitable?

My persopnal view is on Modular transformation, since the transformation strategy focusing brands streamlining and product focus which is kindof related to large reorientation. Anyone agree?

发表于 2011-10-15 05:29 |显示全部楼层

回复 maidywang 40# 帖子

此文章由 schee 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 schee 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
hi agree with you - should be Modular Transformation Change - this is radical change that is focused on specific part of the organisation rather than the whole
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-15 09:38 |显示全部楼层

回复 maidywang 40# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
sorry, i tend to disagree on this. let's look at the bigger picture. the radical change of the corporate is structural: from clothing and textile manufaturing to brand marketer. brands/product focus and streamling was just a reflection of this structural shift. This was also evidenced by change of top management team like CEO & CFO instead of operation managers in certain functional units. So it's more like corporate transformation than modular one.

评分

参与人数 1积分 +3 收起 理由
tjjimmycy + 3 谢谢分享

查看全部评分

发表于 2011-10-15 10:05 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 tjjimmycy 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 tjjimmycy 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
关于他的GENERIC STRATEGY, 有没有觉得PB有点倾向于 DIFFERENTIATION + LOW COST呢

发表于 2011-10-15 13:44 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 XR8 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 XR8 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
communicating the vision -  Any thoughts at all?
I hardly could find any positive points ...

发表于 2011-10-15 13:55 |显示全部楼层

回复 yonei999 42# 帖子

此文章由 mandymei 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 mandymei 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
There are some arguments in my team as well. I've looked at the facilitator's response to similar question and her opinion is both modular trans. & corporate trans. are radical change (large change), but modular normally involve outsourcing production in a business unit, corporate normally involve merging with another company which is about transforming the corporation.
In this case, since PB is downsizing and focus on a few key brands, so i recon it's still kind of business unit - modular change.

Correct me if i'm wrong.

发表于 2011-10-15 13:56 |显示全部楼层

回复 XR8 44# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
communicating the vision

How addressed in the transformation: It can be reasonably inferred from the article that effective communication of vision and strategy is involved in convincing the board members that what Morphet was doing was right. This is also seen in the inspiration she brings to the people around her. Morphet got credit through all these.

评分

参与人数 1积分 +4 收起 理由
NeoLife + 4 感谢分享

查看全部评分

Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-15 14:03 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Beck 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Beck 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
In 5qs. the 5th Q,what is the industry position it plans to hold? Anywhere in the case specified? Any arguements?
Thanks,

发表于 2011-10-15 14:10 |显示全部楼层

回复 Beck 47# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
we really are focused on consumer goods and textile (pg 7 of 18)

发表于 2011-10-15 14:19 |显示全部楼层

回复 yonei999 48# 帖子

此文章由 Beck 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Beck 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
See P3.27."Many business strategies..........with no thought given as to what industry position it wants to achieve through its strategies" Any ideas on the "Industry position" it wants to achieve??

发表于 2011-10-15 14:44 |显示全部楼层

回复 Beck 49# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
similar to the statement of BUPA on P3.27 of txt book. Since PB is undergoing a transformation, it's hard to say what particular position it wants to hold (in manufacturing industry).

发表于 2011-10-15 14:56 |显示全部楼层

回复 yonei999 42# 帖子

此文章由 Beck 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Beck 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
If this is Corp Trans, is there any significant gaps between the current approach and futher objectives?
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-15 15:07 |显示全部楼层

回复 mandymei 45# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
Thanks Mandy. I agree there is a bit of touch of modular transformation. The strutural change is not simply limited to outsourcing production to China and selling off beds and foam businesses, even though these changes by themselves are very complex. Note the dire issues Morphet had to combat when she took her position: cost-cutting, reorganizing capital management and debt refinancing; simplify logistics and operations; sourcing production offshore and developing capabilities required as a brand marketer. (pg 6 of 18). I saw nearly every part of PB's value chain has been affected in that way before the delivery to its clients...

发表于 2011-10-15 15:25 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 XR8 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 XR8 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
I would put my hand up for corporate transformation giving the facts that every single criteria in the definition has been met. "Significant or radical change throughout the whole organisation that addresses significant gaps that have been identified between the current approach and future objectives."

look at the first page again - Morphet's priority  has been Implementing a three year restructuring strategy: cost cutting, reorganizing capital management and debt refinancing, simplifying logistic and operations, sourcing production offshore and developing capabilities required as a brand marketer. Clearly it involves operational, financial, stratergy as well as management changes not just modular transformation.

发表于 2011-10-15 15:25 |显示全部楼层

回复 Beck 51# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
to list a few:

fickle market, ACCC's review on sale of business, Chinese political and legal system, tapering sales, shattered investor confidence, private equity ownership still exist...

发表于 2011-10-15 15:27 |显示全部楼层

回复 XR8 53# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
lol, you so cute, XR8.

发表于 2011-10-15 18:10 |显示全部楼层

回复 Chchou 17# 帖子

此文章由 siyuezhao 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 siyuezhao 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
PB is trying to reduce the Brand they currently hold through closing down factories and sell unprofitable brands.
from my personal point of view, selling non-profit brand doesn't mean narrow down their market, comparing with it's competitors.
The final goal is to reduce cost.


Remember  in the text book, the example they use to illustrate focus-narrow market strategy is yellow tail wine producer. the wine producer enter a small, new market no one else had paid attentioned yet.


therefore, i think the generic strategy shoud be leader strategy-low cost and diff.
Advertisement
Advertisement

发表于 2011-10-15 18:16 |显示全部楼层
此文章由 Beck 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Beck 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
being polarised, PB is focusing on the mundane goods with more bargains?? Is this correct?

发表于 2011-10-15 18:44 |显示全部楼层

回复 Beck 57# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
yep, it will cost one 4 - 5 times more to buy a CK undie than a Bonds one... Oooops, i am bullshXXing again...

发表于 2011-10-15 20:23 |显示全部楼层

回复 yonei999 58# 帖子

此文章由 Beck 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 Beck 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
  Thanks
for Leaning and growth perspective (BSC), how would you make up the points.

发表于 2011-10-15 21:04 |显示全部楼层

回复 Beck 59# 帖子

此文章由 yonei999 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 yonei999 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
i doubt BSC will be tested. Nonetheless, i still listed just in the case

Focus on the brands and products are high; the first of the mainstream blue-collar companies to make a significant shift; Recruitment of talented top management team.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Advertisement
Advertisement
返回顶部