|
此文章由 DDD888 原创或转贴,不代表本站立场和观点,版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 DDD888 所有!转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明,并保持内容完整
我將我的疑惑問了chatgpt
這是回答
for rust language learning, writing unit test by hand vs using ai which can improve programming skill?
Writing unit tests by hand will improve your programming skills more effectively than relying on AI-generated tests. Here’s why:
1. Understanding Test Design
Writing tests manually forces you to think critically about test cases, edge cases, and expected behaviors.
It helps you understand the logic of your code deeply, identifying weak points and potential bugs.
2. Learning Rust's Testing Framework
Manually writing tests helps you get familiar with Rust’s built-in testing features (#[test], assert!, assert_eq!, assert_ne!, etc.).
You learn how to use cargo test effectively and understand test organization in Rust.
3. Improving Debugging Skills
Writing tests yourself helps you understand failure patterns and debugging strategies.
It builds experience in troubleshooting and refining test cases when they fail.
4. Better Code Structuring
Thinking about testability while writing code improves your design skills, leading to cleaner, modular, and maintainable code.
You'll naturally write functions with clear inputs and outputs, reducing dependencies and side effects.
5. AI-Assisted Testing Can Help, But…
AI-generated tests can provide a starting point, catching simple mistakes quickly.
However, AI may not always understand the intent behind your code, missing nuanced or edge cases.
Over-reliance on AI can hinder deep learning and problem-solving skills.
Best Approach
Start with manual testing to develop strong fundamentals.
Use AI as a supplementary tool to generate additional test cases or to check for missing scenarios.
Review and refine AI-generated tests rather than blindly accepting them.
By manually writing tests, you gain deeper insights into Rust programming, making you a stronger and more independent developer.
|
|