|
|
此文章由 samxsam 原创或转贴，不代表本站立场和观点，版权归 oursteps.com.au 和作者 samxsam 所有！转贴必须注明作者、出处和本声明，并保持内容完整
Many people assume parental consent must always be obtained when photographing children. But aside from specific provisions in the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (especially child protection orders arising from abuse, AVO's or custody proceedings), children are not afforded unique legislative protection when it comes to photographs, consent, privacy or defamation. As with adults you need a signed release for commercial use, but for non-commercial images — nothing.
...
Photographing children without consent is certainly a provocative topic! Part of the reason school groups (see below) or Local Councils try to ban photography at dances, plays or sporting carnivals is to "protect" children from "internet pedophiles". Likewise many of the submissions to the 2005 AG discussion paper referred to the need to "protect" children from unauthorised use of their image on websites, blogs etc.
Yet until the law changes, consent for general child photography remains purely an ethical and moral issue, not a legal one.
from http://www.4020.net/words/photorights.php
原帖由 sywex 于 2009-7-9 09:03 发表 
其他的不清楚, 体育比赛有这样的规定,16岁以下不经允许不能拍.
那是个别个案主办当局有权利禁止你拍照， 但那其实不犯法。(至少还没有任何一条法律能用来告你) 就好像你在private property， owner 有权禁止拍照， 你在街上拿起相机， 当事人可以不让你拍。 但那是人情，文化与伦理的课题，不是法律的问题....至少还不是。只是人家禁止了你就不要拍就对了。
我想摄影师要尊重所拍的对象， 也要谨慎如何使用自己拍的照片， 但对于自己的权力，还是要清楚。 不要过分执着，也不要太人云亦云就放弃了本身权力。 
我不是硬要说我是对的  ， 但我想这是每个在澳的摄影师都关注的吧？ 有些人可能因为某些言论或经验就以为那是被禁止的。 但其实不是的。 但如果当事人或他们的父母觉得反感， 那人情上我们是不该拍的。
[ 本帖最后由 samxsam 于 2009-7-9 12:08 编辑 ] |
|
参加活动第三晚最简单晚餐--青口水蛋，清炒茼蒿，伪夫妻肺片（绝好的红油哦） (2010-7-21) ivvivv 
发表于 2009-7-8 17:44
.gif)
