回复 005400 29# 帖子
thanks, just thought I threw my 2 cents in to fire up the discussion on this forum.[ 本帖最后由 yonei999 于 2011-10-11 19:45 编辑 ]
回复 yonei999 30# 帖子
I had a look of case again. You are right. Thank you回复 yonei999 24# 帖子
Hi Yonei999, do you agree Real Estate is the supplier of the shopping centre? Or, do you have other ideas for it?Thanks,
回复 mandymei 33# 帖子
I think supplier is not applicable in this case. Shopping centre itself provides retail spaces and services.Forces are applicable:
New entry (economics of scale, capital requirement, switching cost)
Buyer
Buyer's buyer
Substitute
Rivalry - low (shopping centre are regional)
回复 mandymei 33# 帖子
There is no clear mention of suppliers for shopping centres but if you insist you can reasonably infer utility suppliers and marketing service provider etc from para 1, page 2 of preseen material[ 本帖最后由 yonei999 于 2011-10-12 00:14 编辑 ] utility suppliers and marketing service provider ,land developer == totally beyond cs.so forget it
rivalry - shoudl be high , due to exist expn & life cycle ~, not easy to close down shopping ctr , my view,
how do you guys addr life cycle - mature -skout- decline ~?& any clues on basis of competitions ??
[ 本帖最后由 sofiwy 于 2011-10-12 00:53 编辑 ]
回复 sofiwy 36# 帖子
Regarding life cycle, the industry is in the stage of Shakeout.回复 maidywang 37# 帖子
Agreed 原帖由 maidywang 于 2011-10-12 01:20 发表 http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/images/common/back.gifRegarding life cycle, the industry is in the stage of Shakeout.
I think the same thing. for anyone that's unable to copy and paste directly from the preseen exam material. try Advanced PDF Password Recovery to unlock the file. sorry I was unable to upload the file cuz of the cap of 80k...
[ 本帖最后由 yonei999 于 2011-10-13 00:01 编辑 ] 原帖由 maidywang 于 2011-10-12 01:20 发表 http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/images/common/back.gif
Regarding life cycle, the industry is in the stage of Shakeout.
The life cycle is still pre-shakeout, noticing the future tense the article used regarding the pressure on shopping centre owners. the inference is it has not happened yet. So a mature but pre-shakeout stage is more appropriate to describe the life cycle. just my 2 cents. 原帖由 yonei999 于 2011-10-13 00:06 发表 http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/images/common/back.gif
The life cycle is still pre-shakeout, noticing the future tense the article used regarding the pressure on shopping centre owners. the inference is it has not happened yet. So a mature but pre-shake ...
One more thing to add: the retail store space is part of the shopping centre portfolio. so really the impact of online shopping is indirect on shopping centre industry and the consequence takes a while to reveal...
回复 yonei999 41# 帖子
Thanks yonei999, just clarified my concerns. so based on Porter's model, the future profitability of the shopping centre will be medium and declinning (Threat of new entrants- Low; Threat of substitutes- Medium to High,Increasing; Power of buyers- Low but Increasing; Power of buyer’s buyer- Medium to High, Increasing; Industry rivalry- Medium to High and Increasing)anyone has other thoughts? Anyone have idea abt the TEMPLE analysis regarding the Political and Law and environmental ?
[ 本帖最后由 chun4u 于 2011-10-13 01:35 编辑 ] Guys, dont forget the shopping centre contains cinema, food court, retail stores, super market, banks, etc, therefore, online shopping is only one of the reason affecting the shopping centre.
回复 chun4u 46# 帖子
The title of the case is ' the impact of ONLINE SHOPPING on shopping centre in Australia', so it pretty much shows the direction we should focus on 原帖由 maidywang 于 2011-10-13 02:33 发表 http://www.oursteps.com.au/bbs/images/common/back.gifThe title of the case is ' the impact of ONLINE SHOPPING on shopping centre in Australia', so it pretty much shows the direction we should focus on
actually what i mean is Online shopping have a indirect effect to Shopping centre~
回复 maidywang 44# 帖子
There are two points i'm not agree with:1. 'Power of buyers- Low but Increasing' - i think should be medium to high because In some categories, physical stores will pretty much disappear (decreasing demand for physical space), so buyers' power is increasing;
2. 'Industry rivalry- Medium to High and Increasing' - i think should be low because in Australia, only a few major players determine market trends and consume offerings. Historically distribution power sat with a small number of major shopping centre owners.
anyone else has comments? Thanks.
回复 chun4u 45# 帖子
I put N/A to these three factors, cause this case does mention too much.But how do you address Society/Culture?
Thanks, 楼主辛苦一点把大家认为的考点真理在一楼,大家认为怎么样啊。
Value chain of the shopping centre industry
Guys, How do you think the value chain of the shopping centre industry in Australia?I am not quite sure whether the case covered this point!
Any ideas?
回复 young20061113 52# 帖子
The industry is Australian shopping centre industry. Its core activities cover building, development, management of shopping centres (providing services like maintenance and marketing) and leasing store spaces to retail shops, restaurant & other eateries, banks and other leisure facilities. 这跟去年的一个CASE差不多嘛,大家可以参考一下去年考了HD的TX的NOTES。去年的CASE是online travel agent对traditonal travel agent的冲击。
回复 mandymei 49# 帖子
Thanks for your comments. Yours makes much more sense.回复 mandymei 50# 帖子
Social: a) Australian consumers have been always early adopters of technologyb). Early adopters of technology have no allegiance to a physical shop or shopping centre
...
to name a few.
回复 yonei999 56# 帖子
Thanks Yonei999. Can i add two more points here:1. In Australia, a few major players determine market trends and consumer offerings, This has allowed some large retailers to become slow and lacking in innovation.
2. Population is increasing in Australia - although not mentioned in this case, but i think it could be a trend to affect the social and culture.
Please correct me if i'm wrong.
回复 mandymei 57# 帖子
Pt 1, agreed.Pt 2, not necessary.
You may add pt like:a. consumers will still want to wander around shopping centres as a form of information gathering and social interaction. (This experience will not be limited to U.S.)
b) continued needs from consumers to have products replaced or serviced
IMHO
回复 yonei999 58# 帖子
When adressing Society/Culture, what about :Customers are more knowledgeable about the product. When visiting the shopping centre, they shop smarter?回复 maidywang 59# 帖子
I have attributed to the techno lead product savy consumers to tech factor...Components under TEMPLE are quite related so one factor could overlap another. No big deal. :)